Forumite Members › General Topics › TV, Film and Music › TV, Film & Music › Scam – or genuine?
- This topic has 9 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 6 months ago by
Dave Rice.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 23, 2019 at 11:57 am #35809
OK I bit at the advert, but there have been so many scams claiming the ‘ TV Dragons all invested ‘ that my scam antennae switched on. Does anyone know if there is even a shred of truth behind the claims made at this link?
Legality of claims is another issue, but it is the technical bit that interests me.
August 23, 2019 at 12:13 pm #35810According to Trustpilot, scam.
August 23, 2019 at 1:20 pm #35811It is an utter nonsense ?
Who would be transmitting these mysterious channels ?
All the TV transmitting multiplexes in the UK are well known and with a wideband Arial you can receive the lot.
August 23, 2019 at 2:26 pm #35812Ed, you want a technical opinion. first, let us separate the untruths as I read them. get rid of all your paid for subscription TV (Good idea, LKA) and then use our amplified antenna. Hmm. What do you use it with? Your terrestrial digital TV of course, otherwise known as “Freeview” in the UK.
Does it work? Well, maybe. But remember you can not beat the laws of physics.There is a finite “amount” of signal at your location. If, like me, your only transmitter is “across the sea in Ireland” (change one word and you have an old song) then you will struggle to get good reception. I use what is known as a “Quad Bow tie” aerial, and an amplifier up on the mast, a tall one double lashed to the chimney stack. In the loft space is a second low power amplifier which also supplies the 12v to the masthead amp. That device would be a waste of money for me.
Now you might have a signal where you can pick it up on “a piece of wet string”, but if it is a bit poor sometimes (dry string?), then that thing would probably work.
If you are in a strong signal area, and don’t want an external antenna up on the roof, get one. Remember however, the further you are away from being “up in the sky” with it, the closer you are to all the interference generated in modern houses.
Most electronic devices sold legally over here cary a CE mark, but in reality, very, very few would individually pass the actual tests if so subjected. It is all “self certification”, with no checks. Very often you can open up some device (TV, Hi Fi etc.) and if you look at the actual printed circuit where the mains connect, there will be empty places where interference related components are not present. They MAY have been there on the prototypes during certification, but not in production.
It is ALL, a b***dy big can of worms.
Les.
August 23, 2019 at 5:01 pm #35815Les, are you saying that Sky (for example) actually duplicates its satellite signal on the UHF transmitters? I found that very difficult to believe as it must have a cost.
August 23, 2019 at 6:16 pm #35818As has been said, Sky and all the other interested parties would be on them like bloodhounds even if it were legit. Which it is not.
If it sounds too good to be true….???
When the Thought Police arrive at your door, think -
I'm out.August 23, 2019 at 6:20 pm #35819Yep, I wouldn’t bother with it. I’d like to know if sky does broadcast ota though. As if they do, it won’t belong untill someone finds it now.
August 23, 2019 at 8:07 pm #35821Ed, No, I don’t expect Sky is there ** and clearly that sort of claim is untrue, but I was commenting more on the technical side of it. Maybe I was not clear, it is just that I disapprove of all paid for stuff. BBC, ITV etc get short shrift from the public, but they have been financially starved since the paid for stuff arrived. They (the paid for companies) use their wealth to lobby against the BBC licence fee. If you look at what Freeview offers for £££s ZERO, and weigh that against the cost of the multiple subs some people pay, it takes a bit of thinking about. NOBODY can watch the whole lot!
** MAYBE Sky one (if it still exists) is on Freeview, it used to be freely available on satellite, but everything else was subs only.
Summing up my technical opinion, the thing is JUST a TV antenna, of limited capability.
For a weak signal area, you either want (A) a dipole with numerous director and reflector elements, for high gain, or signal “pull in” ability. or “B”, one like mine which has lower gain, but a “clean” signal, usually needing further amplification.
I generally watch more than 30mins, but less than 75 mins weekdays, rather less at weekends. I have “pirated” some stuff which I can not legally receive in the past but not now. I listen to the Radio (a little local radio News, plus R3 or R4 much of the rest of the time if in a listenable situation.
Les.
August 24, 2019 at 6:14 am #35823This device was originally sold to less than tec savy Americans who did not realise they could still get TV via an arial. The low frequency signals they referred to are are actually the standard UHF ones instead of the microwaves you get from a satellite.
At some point it was decided that Europeans would fall for it too and apparently they have ???
August 24, 2019 at 6:39 am #35824It’s been about for years under different names.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
