Forumite Members › General Topics › Other Stuff › Storing CD's.
- This topic has 11 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by
The Duke.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 16, 2017 at 3:46 pm #5249
I am still battling to record all my music collections to my NAS and an external drive, planning to use some form of Cloud eventually, and finding that there are a lot of CD’s that I will not ever need again. These will go to a Homeless charity I donate to, but also there are many more that I want to keep. I was looking at suitable storage and came across this, have taken two boxes:
I have a diagram to show internal & external dimensions:

It can hold up to 52 jewel cases, if any Forumites have a need for this, I recommend the boxes. They have a securing clip which makes them airtight and keeps them together, stored longest side up. I am pleased with these and it allows me to keep the discs I want, stored safely in the shed. It may be possible to get a few more than 50/52, in the empty space, stored shortest side up.
When the Thought Police arrive at your door, think -
I'm out.March 16, 2017 at 4:17 pm #5251Mine are all just rammed into a cupboard. which means heaven forbid I should want to retrieve one then its time to get the spade out.
I difficult task I must say even though I have the ace of spades. Sorry couldn’t resist.
But more importantly I’ve switched to a new updated sound engine app that hooks into my creative sound card darn good.
its AIMP v4.13.
Its all about the sound and for me I get outstanding results. Yes way, I can resurrect the dead and have Thin Lizzy in my living room.
Interface is a bit rough though.
May be worth a try for you, I have a dozen similar apps on my media pc and AIMP is coming out as best. :good:
March 16, 2017 at 9:51 pm #5255My ears are past the point of no return I’m afraid. When I was younger I had an amazing sound system, then time, relationship breakdown and associated financial ‘penalties’ intervened and I had to sell a great deal of good stuff to survive. That did not include my vinyl collection. Some of those are rare, including early 50’s records which are all in perfect nick, thanks to recording them to other media, becinning with open reel tape, cassettes, CD’s and now digitally transferred to Hdd’s.
After I met the love of my life, kids and more financial penalties prevented me from affording any expensive stuff. Now I can afford it, it has become irrelevant and I much prefer a good pair of headphones attached to the PC, or streaming 320 kbps MP3 around whatever outlet is nearest. I love 50’s, 60’s and 70’s rock: Stones, Creedence/John Fogerty, and Blues. I am saving for a decent Technics system that will allow me to record to & from vinyl, CD and USB: not too fancy, just good reproduction. I don’t have a separate sound card in the PC for the same reasons, the onboard card is fine for my purposes.
When the Thought Police arrive at your door, think -
I'm out.March 17, 2017 at 12:04 am #5256finding that there are a lot of CD’s that I will not ever need again
I feel I should just point out that if you’re passing the CDs on to someone else, you no longer have a legal right to the rips you’ve made of them. You’d have made a single purchase but given two people access to the material. This may or may not concern you, but I felt the legal case should at least be made.
March 17, 2017 at 1:28 am #5257Once you upload them to Google music, you get the he rights back. One of the is best as you eats of Google music (and others) is that you can usually upload some terribly ripped (or even illegitimate) music and you get lovely ligit 320kbps tracks back.
Ive uploaded all my music, not a great deal as I’m not a music fan, I like the Beatles, Queen and oasis, my music affair ended mid teens, and if I feel like music that’s all I turn to.
Though with the advent of the net and download sites of the early 2000s I did end up with a lot of music, my kids added to that, so it all ended up on Google’s drive. No one ever listens to any of it.
The kids use Spotify free now, even though I have paid for Google music a few time, I found theyd rather use Spotify, so that saves Mr £15pm for the family sub I was playing. And I use Google music to stream my short play list that is made up of albums I bought as a teen.
Never really got the appeal of music. Seems a waist of time. Rather listen to a book while driving than music.
March 17, 2017 at 7:40 am #5260Bob – the really useful boxes are fantastic. The larger ones are all designed to stack with each other and have the same footprint, just a lower box. I bought a load of the 50L boxes for moving and storing stuff under the bed.
Our cadet unit relies on them for everything!
"Everything looks interesting until you do it. Then you find it’s just another job" - Terry Pratchett
March 17, 2017 at 1:14 pm #5265Once you upload them to Google music, you get the he rights back.
Not so. Unless you owned the material originally or had a right to use it, the law has still been broken. Will anyone find out? Unlikely. Will anyone care? Unlikely. But that doesn’t change the plain fact that the music has been acquired illegally. It’s the music equivalent of money laundering.
Don’t get me wrong — I’m not making a judgement. I’m not pretending to be squeaky clean. I’m merely presenting the facts rather than ‘alternative facts’.
March 17, 2017 at 4:22 pm #5274We know, but once uploaded, the music then becomes yours. Or at the least, you end up with a decent mp3, not the rubbish you ripped in 01 or the terrible download you waited 40minutes to download back then.
Talking about illegally getting music, my lad, has access to multiple legal route, I even paid for play music as mentioned above, I’ve paid for Spotify in the past, but he still rips his music from YouTube! Apparently all the kids do it. I just don’t see the point today, especially as he has 7gb of data a month. He’ll rip the mp3 off youtube on his phone, then manage it himself.
I suppose at least he is learning something! Gotta look for the silver lining.
March 17, 2017 at 5:35 pm #5276I understand your point Jason, it’s clearly against copyright, but I have also bought CD’s from Amazon Music and downloaded the free MP3 tracks associated with the purchased CD. I have no idea how the law would apply when I give some of those CD’s to charity. The gift to charity then makes the CD’s second-hand, or pre-owned, however you think of it. Not dismissing your point, which is absolutely correct, just the stupidity of a law that could be applied to the sale or gifting of a pre-owned product. I have sold books and given many more to charity, how is that different? The Designer of any product: car, furniture, vase, pottery, musical instrument, in fact anything, cannot expect to own the copyright to that product and have a say in its future. As I have said, your legal point is well made. It’s the law that requires change.
Chris: I have quite a few of the larger Really Useful boxes, or should I say, I had a few. I bought several 2 years ago when SWMBO and I went for a Danube Cruise and had the whole place redecorated while away. They were stacked up 5 high in my big shed with household stuff, good job it has a solid base. After we unpacked them, our daughter moved to her partner’s house and began rebuilding her own for sale. Of course she needed boxes… Then our grandson found a flat and he needed boxes. I now have no clue how many I once had. 😥
Steve I like Amazon Music. after I might (someday) finish recording all my collection, I may well use Google Drive to store it, along with my photos. That will cost a bit I expect: I am not halfway through the music and already have 11 GB, 1,000’s of images. I also rip in 320 Kbps. My ears now cannot differentiate between that and WMA. I love rock music and hard Blues, so when I play the Stones, Creedence or any of the old Delta Blues men, the missus banishes me to this room and the headphones. She likes Billy Fury, think she’s been mourning his passing for years! He was the first ‘Liverpool Sound’ of course, before the Beatles, last night I got around to putting all his music on the NAS, was listening to a lot of it and remembered how good he was in most of it. I like all the Beatles’ early stuff, but not anything later, after the Maharishi and the drugs. It got all too weird for me. I particularly like Lennon singing “Revolution” – a real rocker.
Ripping tracks from YT is what my youngest gson does too. Speaking of music copyright issues, he rips CD’s full of requested music for his mates and others, also helps them with PC problems, all for a price. They have to supply the blank CD’s or USB sticks. He will either end up in nick or become a millionaire. Or both. :unsure: :whistle: :yes:
When the Thought Police arrive at your door, think -
I'm out.March 17, 2017 at 6:21 pm #5279Google drive games with a few 15g space. Your pictures if below 16gb wouldn’t eat into the space, if they are you have the choice to save in full res, with will work against for free allowance, or for google to scale them down to 16mp (they do a great job),and they are free.
With music, you have I thin 25,000 tracks free, then your music will start eating into your free allowance.
So it’s quite hard these days to bust through your cap, I did years ago when it wasn’t all these free options. Though once you fill up your 15gb, it’s £1.99 a month for 100gb.
I also save my photos to Flickr, it’s great, not quite as strait forward as Google photos, but very powerful and you get free unlimited full res. Though given the state of Yahoo, I’d first use Google then Flickr as a secondary back up. Ive been using then over 10 years, but for the past few I have trouble trusting Flickrs longevity.
March 17, 2017 at 8:38 pm #5281Thanks for that Steve, £1.99 a month for 100 GB sounds good to me. I will never go near anything to do with Yahoo if I can help it, too many problems for too long and they keep repeating the same security mistakes.
When the Thought Police arrive at your door, think -
I'm out.March 18, 2017 at 2:56 pm #5299Yahoo is in terrible shape I don’t think it’s long for this world. Marrisa Mayer was probably their best shot, and that didn’t work.
The trouble with Yahoo is it doesn’t know what to focus on. It’s got so many poor products. It’s only good one is Flickr, and I doubt it makes a penny. More likely costs millions a year.
Atm they want to o be a media and new outlet, at a time when news doesn’t pay, and alot of others have got media nailed down.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
