Forumite Members › General Topics › Tech › Security Talk › Intel 'fesses up to 'Spy in the Chip'
- This topic has 5 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 3 months ago by
wasbit.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 22, 2017 at 7:25 am #13685
After many years of rumours about the ‘spy/remote controller’ that Intel built into their Management Engine architecture, they have at last confessed to the lesser charge of having a major security vulnerability built into their boards.
Nothing much one can do about it except perhaps buy an AMD Ryzen set-up, or undertake a very hazardous fix to disable this nasty.
November 22, 2017 at 11:32 am #13695Not often you get to feel smug with 10 year old pc’s lol.
November 23, 2017 at 1:11 am #13698Ah, is this MINIX?
“MINIX. The Unix-like OS originally developed by Andrew Tanenbaum as an educational tool — to demonstrate operating system programming — is built into every new Intel CPU.
MINIX is running on “Ring -3” (that’s “negative 3”) on its own CPU. A CPU that you, the user/owner of the machine, have no access to. The lowest “Ring” you have any real access to is “Ring 0,” which is where the kernel of your OS (the one that you actually chose to use, such as Linux) resides. Most user applications take place in “Ring 3” (without the negative).
--
Regards
wasbitRig 1: Optiplex 3050 SFF
Rig 2: Asus ROG G20CB (rebuilt wreck)
Rig 3: HP Elitebook 8440PDear Starfleet, hate you, hate the Federation, taking Voyager. - Janeway
November 23, 2017 at 7:16 am #13702Yep – Minix III. link
It is also probably the basis for the remote attacks revealed by Snowdon in which an Intel PC can be completely bricked (currently if the management engine does not run then the PC will not boot). As it gives low level unmonitored access to the IP stack it is also probably the way NSA/GCHQ can do a complete big Brother on any Intel mobo/PC. As usual the danger is now that every bot net manager will be looking to this to increase the size of their control span. The Intel Management Engine is a prime example of the dangers of a Government insisting on hidden back doors.
November 23, 2017 at 6:41 pm #13724Not often you get to feel smug with 10 year old pc’s lol.
Or with a low-end AMD M5a78L – M LE- USB3 Mobo that has a low-end FX-6300!
When the Thought Police arrive at your door, think -
I'm out.November 23, 2017 at 6:49 pm #13725Looks like it’s all kicking off.
Intel: We’ve found severe bugs in secretive Management Engine, affecting millions
– http://www.zdnet.com/article/intel-weve-found-severe-bugs-in-secretive-management-engine-affecting-millions/See if you’re vulnerable:
– https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/27150“Intel’s Management Engine is a security hazard, and users need a way to disable it”
– https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/05/intels-management-engine-security-hazard-and-users-need-way-disable-it“Disable Intel ME thanks to the NSA”
– https://www.csoonline.com/article/3220476/security/researchers-say-now-you-too-can-disable-intel-me-backdoor-thanks-to-the-nsa.html“Positive Technologies also made its Intel ME 11.x firmware image unpacker utility available on GitHub. Use at your own risk; the methods to disable Intel ME were described as “risky and may damage or destroy your computer.”
--
Regards
wasbitRig 1: Optiplex 3050 SFF
Rig 2: Asus ROG G20CB (rebuilt wreck)
Rig 3: HP Elitebook 8440PDear Starfleet, hate you, hate the Federation, taking Voyager. - Janeway
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
